Monday, December 26, 2011

Fears over Chinese need

IF YOU were to employ the eye of an archaeologist along an old track starting at the seaside village of Robe across the South Australian border and head into Victoria, crossing the Glenelg River at Casterton, skirting the Grampians and wending your way to Ballarat and Bendigo, you would find evidence of an astonishing journey that is all but unknown these days.

You might find the remnants of market gardens planted every 20 kilometres or so. If you looked hard enough you'd come across the remnants of wells dug to slake the thirst of worn-down travellers. In the dust you might even uncover strange coins with holes bored in them - ''holey dollars'' discarded in disgust when their bearers discovered they were worthless in Australia. Here, then, is a forgotten road taken by thousands of Chinese into the heart of the Australian story.

As the Greens and the Nationals and Assistant Treasurer Bill Shorten wrestle with the current spectre of Chinese interests buying up Australian farmland for mining, let's puddle around in the past in order to seek a little perspective.

Advertisement: Story continues below

What happened in Robe and on the road east to Victoria a century and a half ago remains instructive about Australia's ambivalent relationship with the Chinese and the futility of using heavy-handed rules to keep a determined people at bay.

Robe is nothing these days beyond a rather lovely little fishing port. Known for its crayfish, it sits within Guichen Bay about 130 kilometres beyond the Victorian border, which is why it became important so long ago to the Chinese.

As the hopeful and the desperate hustled to Victoria from all points of the world in the 1850s to seek their rake-off of the gold said to be there for the taking, the colonial authorities became alarmed by the arrival of shiploads of Chinese.

It was all right, apparently, for cut-throats and vulgarians and conmen and ladies of a certain reputation to stream in from California, Ireland and Britain, populating the diggings like a cast from Deadwood. The more the merrier, as long as they weren't Chinese.

No matter that the Chinese arrivals worked harder and lived quieter than just about everyone else on the goldfields. Why, they wore pigtails, ate rice and vegetables instead of mutton, smoked opium instead of drinking rotgut, didn't speak English and just looked different. And because most of them had taken out loans to get to Australia and maintained responsibility for their families, they sent home any money they made.

So unpopular were the Chinese that by 1855, four years after the rush began, the government passed an act imposing a £10 poll tax for each Chinese passenger landed at a Victorian port. This was about the same as a passenger's entire fare from China. To make it harder, ships were limited to carrying one Chinese passenger for each 10 tons of the ship's weight. To top it off, a stiff duty was applied to opium.

The lucrative Chinese transport business looked endangered until the wily old captains studied the map. There was no poll tax in South Australia, the state authorities levied a much smaller tax on opium than those in Victoria, and the port of Robe was just beyond Victoria's border (although about 440 kilometres from the gold diggings). The first ship-load of ''celestials'' arrived in Robe in 1857. They were the first of more than 16,000 of their nation's fellows to pass through the tiny town (population 200 at the time) and set off on the long, fraught trek to Ballarat, Bendigo and Beechworth.

Groups were guided for a fee by bullockies across the strange, sparsely populated countryside.

Some of the smarter entrepreneurs dropped off long before the goldfields and established market gardens to feed the stream of travellers to come. Wells were dug to guarantee fresh water. Many hung their belongings from wooden yokes balanced on their shoulders, and for decades afterwards scores of these yokes, tossed aside by the exhausted, were found rotting by the track.

In short, Victoria's shamefully xenophobic legislation failed utterly. The Chinese, like all the others desperate for a chance at fortune, kept coming. They simply found another route around the regulations, however difficult it may have proved, and struck out for gold.

Once gold fever receded, Australian politicians sought a more drastic solution. The White Australia policy was aimed at keeping Chinese out of Australia, even if no country town considered itself complete unless it had a Chinese restaurant. The policy achieved little but ensured that Australia played no constructive part in its own geographic region for more than half the 20th century, artificially propping up its economy behind a protective wall that stultified innovation while Asia set about preparing itself as the power of the century to come.

And here we are. In 2011, there is uproar because Chinese companies have bought 47 NSW farms at a cost of $213 million. The federal government, apparently caught by surprise and assailed by the Greens and Nationals, is scrabbling to find out who owns what in the nation's agricultural areas and considering how (or whether) it can limit foreign ownership.

Yet ever since Europeans arrived in Australia, foreign interests have owned great swaths of the nation's land, resources, industry and infrastructure. Australia's population and domestic wealth have never been enough to drive the sort of development its inhabitants demand. In what is known inelegantly as a ''globalised'' world, any economy that tried to remain an island would sink without trace.

Indeed, Australians seem happy to enjoy a lifestyle funded heavily by Chinese demand for our resources. But now they're coming out here and buying farms, as if they were from any of the other numerous foreign nationalities that have owned Australian land for the past 200 years … why, that's a step too far, apparently. Next they'll want to dig for gold again.

By all means Australia should work out who owns what, set its own rules on what can and what can't be sold and debate the wisdom or lack of it in allowing foreign investment in food-growing land.

But before the Greens and Nationals run away with themselves trying to argue that the Chinese are different because their businesses are effectively owned by the Chinese government, the story of Robe ought to be recalled. It's not just wrong-headed to single out a nationality for special treatment. It doesn't work.

Chinese Australians

Chinese Australians owed apology for discrimination against forebears

The worst anti-Chinese riots in Australian history occurred 150 years ago today on the Burrangong goldfields of Lambing Flat, near Young, NSW. Anti-Chinese immigration laws had been introduced six years earlier, in 1855, by the Colony of Victoria and every colonial government followed with similar legislation.

This eventually led, upon Federation, to the Immigration Restriction Act 1901 or the White Australia Policy, which was in place until 1973. For nearly 120 years the Chinese were treated in this country as lesser human beings.

Why then have Chinese Australians, who were subjected to discriminatory policies for such a long period, not done anything to right these wrongs? Surely we do not have to wait as long as the first citizens of this country to get an apology and be recognised for the contributions we have made to the country we call home. It is only now that there are stirrings in the Chinese Australian community to have past wrongs recognised for what they were.

Advertisement: Story continues below

The beginnings date back to the Gold Rush when, to restrict the number of Chinese entering Australia, Victoria passed an act to regulate the conveyance of passengers to Victoria. South Australia followed with an act to make provision for levying a charge on Chinese arriving in South Australia, while NSW enacted the Chinese Immigrant Regulation and Restriction Act of 1861. These acts applied an entrance or head tax, as well as regulating the number of Chinese passengers a ship was allowed to carry.

These discriminatory practices led to the infamous White Australia Policy, which incorporated a dictation test (not necessarily in English) and was aimed at keeping non-whites (mainly Chinese) from entering Australia. The dictation test remained until 1958 and the last vestiges of the policy were removed by Gough Whitlam's Labor government in 1973. Little did I know when I arrived in Sydney as a New Zealand citizen in 1964 that the Immigration Restriction Act applied to me and I (unlike white New Zealanders) was required to have an entry visa.

Other countries, such as New Zealand and Canada, followed this Australian precedent of using a head or poll tax as an immigration restriction measure. New Zealand adopted the practice with a £10 entry tax, later increased to £100 (my father was one of those who had to pay), and Canada imposed a poll tax on the Chinese in 1885. The tax was repealed by Canada in 1923 and by New Zealand in 1944.

The Chinese in New Zealand, Canada and the US have received apologies and reparations for these discriminatory policies. On Chinese New Year in 2002, the New Zealand prime minister, Helen Clark, said: "I wish to announce today that the government has decided to make a formal apology to those Chinese people who paid the poll tax and suffered other discrimination imposed by statute, and to their descendants.

''With respect to the poll tax we recognise the considerable hardship it imposed and that the cost of it and the impact of other discriminatory immigration practices split families apart . . . We believe this act of reconciliation is required to ensure that full closure can be reached on this chapter in our nation's history."

Her government contributed $NZ5 million to establish a Chinese Poll Tax Heritage Trust. But people who paid the tax were not personally compensated.

In 2006, the Canadian Prime Minister, Stephen Harper, apologised for the Chinese head tax, offering a ''symbolic payment'' of $C20,000 to surviving payers of the tax and their spouses. An additional $C10 million was added to the $C25 million already put aside to finance cultural community improvement projects and a ''national recognition'' education program.

In 2009, the California legislature approved a bill apologising to Chinese Americans for racist laws dating from the 1852 foreign miners' tax aimed at Chinese immigrants, to other laws such as the 1882 Chinese Exclusion Act passed by the US Congress. The bill also recognises the contributions that Chinese immigrants made to the state, particularly their work on the Transcontinental Railroad.

Surely, it is past time that this issue be addressed and redressed in Australia. At a conference organised by the Chinese Community Council of Australia, on the theme of ''Finding the Chinese Australian Voice'', the following resolution was passed: "That this conference resolves to ask the CCCA national executive to Lambing Flalook into the Lambing Flat incident and other discriminatory policies against the Chinese with the possibility of asking the Australian government for an apology and to acknowledge the contributions of Chinese Australians."

The Chinese Australian community, which comprises about 3 per cent of Australia's population, is a diverse group ranging from those whose forebears came to this country in the 1800s to those who have arrived in recent decades. For those whose ancestors came in those early years and suffered all sorts of insults and indignities, let those who arrived more recently appreciate what the community suffered for them to now be equals in a multicultural Australia.

The China of today is not the same China that the early Chinese came from and the Australia of today is also not the one our forebears came to.

It is time for Chinese Australians to shake off the vestiges of the White Australia Policy and the mantle of inferiority and play a greater role in the public life of Australia. I would like to think that history is important and that the Chinese at Lambing Flat did not suffer in vain.

Daphne Lowe Kelley is president of the Chinese Heritage Association of Australia and the 2011 recipient of the NSW Premier's Jack Wong Sue Award for Voluntary Service Beyond the Chinese Community. Her grandfather came to Australia more than a century ago.

Daphne Lowe Kelley

June 30, 2011

Opinion



Saturday, November 5, 2011

CHINESE FAMINE & LIST OF SUBSCRIPTIONS.

The Chinese Consul (Mr Hwang) makes acknowledgment of the following additional subscriptions in connection with the famine in certain Chinese districts Amount previously acknowledged, £199 7s 6d Mr. A. Tom (Featherston), £1 10t> 6d; total collected by Mr. Tom from Chiue.se in Featherston, .62 sa; Messrs. Low and Bing (Wanganui). £3; total collected by Low and Bing from Chinese in Wanganui, £3 ss Mr. J, Hanstad (Haleuitibcj, 3s 6d New Zealand Warehousemen's Association (Wellington), £3 3s total collected by Chinese Kmpiro Reform Association j (Sydney, Australia), .060 12s; Mrs. 1. Janet Bushley (Stoke, Nelson). £2; Mi. Yip Woon (Kumara), £1 total collected by Mr. Yip Woon from Chinese in Kumara, £6 16s 6d total cullcctscl 1 by Mr. Wong Way Kee from Chinese in Masterton, Ho 12s 6d Air. Wah Lee (Auckland). iJ2 An English Lady" (Wellington). 2s 6d j Mr. Sue ll r at (Rcefton), £1; total collected by Mr. Sue Vat from Chinese in Recfton, A3 16s: Mrs. Shea (Wellington), 2s 9d collected by Mr. l 7 eo Hong from Chiucso in Wellington, £2 10s 6d Mr. Gee Lous (Bulk). £1 10s; total collected by Mr. Chew Chong from European friends in New Plymouth, £33 4o; R. D." (Wellington). £2; "An Unknown Friend" (Wellington), ss, tota 1 collected by Mr. Quong Chong On from Chinese in'Hokitika, £4 4s; "A Lady Friend" (per the Rev. W. S. Potter, Wellington). 10s; Mr. D. N. MacDiarmid (New Plymouth). ss; total collected by Messrs. On Chong and Co. from Chinese In Sydney (Australia), £120; "An Anonymous" (Wellington), £I;— total, £465 5s 3d. On 28th January £200 was remitted by cablo through tho Union Bank of Australia, and a sum of £250 is to bo sent to-day to Dr. John C. Ferguson, editor of the Shanghai Times. Further donations will be duly forwarded. Evening Post, Volume LXXXI, Issue 40, 17 February 1911, Page 2

COMPENSATION CLAIM

WITNESSES IN CHINA COMMISSION REFUSED An appeal from an order of Mr. Justice Herdman at Auckland dismissing a summons for leave to issuo a commission for the examination of witnesses in China was heard in the Court of Appeal todajv Tho case was one in which Thomas Wong Doo, merchant, of Auckland, suing under tho Deaths by Accident Compensation Act, 1908, as executor of the estate, of his brother, William Quoi (otherwise Wong Quoi), market gardener, of Auckland, deceased, claimed £2120 compensation from Kana Bhana, fruiterer, of Auckland, following Quoi's death from injuries received through being struck by a, motor-lorry. "The Chief Justice (Sir Michael Myers) presided, and with him were Mr. Justice. Bced, Mr. Justice Mac- Gregor, "Mr. Justice Ostler,' and Mr. Justice Smith., Mr..L. P.'Leary appeared for the appellant,-and Mr. V. R. Meredith for the "respondent. Jii his judgment on the summons for :leave to issue the commission, Mr. Justice Herdman said that' the. proceedings had" been instituted to recover compensation for Quoi's .wife and.family who1 were living in China. As the case was to be heard by a jury it would be for tho jury to decide'whether or not witnesses testifying to vital issues relating to the validity of the marriage, the paternity of'the children, and. the dependency of all were worthy of credence. Quoi had been married twice, and any evidence in existence that tended to show that the first wife was dead should be investigated with the greatest care. It had been said, too. that polygamy was permissible in China, Bo that Quoi might have had niorc than one wife and more than one family. It followed, therefore, that there might be other claims for compensation if claims at that late hour could now be made. The whole of the circumstances in the case were so unusual and the necessity for strict iproof and careful cross-examination in the face of the jury was, he thought so obvious, that he felt justice could not bo done without insisting upon the personal attendance of witnesses. Mr. Leary submitted that the_ relevant facts could be best ascertained by the examination of the witnesses at Hong Kong, which was not far from the place whore the witnesses lived. The-dismissal of the summons was, he contended, tantamount,to putting such a load-of expense on the shoulders or. those prosecuting the action as to render it impossible for justice to be Mr. Justice Ostler pointed out that a marriage in a country where polygamy was practised was not recognised under British law. Mr Meredith submitted that the respondent was entitled to have the witnesses brought to New Zealand so that they could be eross-.exanuned. He stressed the point that in view of the deceased's occupation and advanced age his. widow and family could not have expected very much from him, and their pecuniary loss was therefore but slight. (Proceeding.) Evening Post, Volume CXVI, Issue 86, 9 October 1933, Page 9

CABBAGES AND RACES

BANKRUPT CHINESE FRUITERER FAILURE DUE TO GAMBLING. It is rare for a native oi China, trading in this Dominion to have to face a meeting of creditors as a bankrupt, but that was the predicament of a Chinese fruiterer, Wong Joe Vim, who met some of his creditors before the Official Assignee (Mr.' S. Tansley) yesterday. There was no statement, the bankrupt absconded four years ago. His assetswere £163 l2s 6d. His liabilities totalled £619 14s lid. The principal creditors were: A. G. Donald, Auckland, £37 7s 6dj M.-C. White and Co., Hastings, £45 6s 9d; W. C. Ling, Carterton, £312 18s 6d; George Gee, Auckland, £74 9s 8d; Griffith and Son, Wellington, £19 15s; Nestles Anglo-Swiss Milk Co., Wellington, £21 17s 6d. The bankrupt exhibited much of the taciturnity of his race in the witness: bos, but eventually was induced to admit ho was a member of the Chinese church. He took the double oath of the match and the Bible. In examination he admitted that under the name of Jimmie Wong he had been in business in Auckland, and had gone bankrupt. There he was: in partnership with one George Chang, who took over th< business and paid the debts, he said. The Official Assignee: You are still undischarged." Wong went on to say he left Auckland about four years ago, and was afterwards in Wanganui and Eketahuna. In the latter place he bought a businesß from his cousin. He admitted he had. shut up his shop in Eketahuna and run away. The Official Assighee: "Why did you run away?" Bankrupt: "Because I had no money." "What did you do with your money?" —"Lost; lost at races." "How much did you lose?"—" More than £700—£700 or £800." From Eketahuna the bankrupt said he went to Christchurch, where he did nothing, living with the Chinamen down there. He-stayed a year in Christchurch. A creditor: Did ivou go to the races?"—" Yes. I only went,to have a look, not to bet." From Christchurch, Wong said, he went on to Dunedin for a holiday, where he had a friend who was intending to go to China. Some of the Chinamen lent him money, especially one Lucy Ung. While he was at Eketahuna he visited races at Palmerston North and Wanganui. Si Wanganui he atayed with Wun Lie. A creditor: More than,one lie. A lot of {hem." The bankrupt' said he had a good business at Eketahuna, his week's takings being from £40 to £90. The Official Assignee said -that the books showed a credit balance of £738 odd before witness ran away from Eketahuna. T ,banfcruPt «aid he had a business m Masterton, but it was not a very' good one; taking from £1 to £5 a day. He was trading under the name of W Y. Wing San. He had bought a new bicycle,, paying £7 on it arid owing still £10. A relation was looking after the shop. The Official Assignee stated that interpreters had refused to act for bankrupt. The bankrupt said his brother had giveu him .-goods to trade with. When he left Eketahuna, he took'about £12 away with him. He owed Sing On Tie in Wellington £50 or £70 for fruit, and Lung Kee about £130 or £140. The cost of fitting the shop was about £40 or £50, and he srtill owed some ■money. He had paid some money to his Chinese creditors. He had about £130 or £140 in stock at the present time. The total assets were about £250 to £270. The Assignee stated that the shop had been seized and the old creditors would get something, but he doubted whether the new ones would. A creditor observed that the bankrupt was a disgrace to thr Chinese, who were asnally honest fellows. The Chinaman was i man whose word was his bond, and this man had brought disrepute to an honourable part of the trading community. In fairness to the bankrupt's countrymen they ought to see that he was punished. The man was and absconded. They ought to prevent him doing the same thing again. He hadlost his money racing. In answer to a question as to whether he had any offer to pay off his Eketahuna debts, the bankrupt, through his interpreter, said he had no offer to make. The money for the ousiness had been advanced to him. A creditor: "He seems to be a professional bankrupt." The difficulty was pointed out that to eeize the present business on behalf of the old creditors would make a third bankruptcy. A creditor: "What we want to do is to prevent this man trading again." It was decided by the creditors to prosecute the bankrupt under tha penal clauses of the Act. Evening Post, Volume CIII, Issue 152, 30 June 1922, Page 4

ARMED HOLD-UP CHINESE THE VICTIM

PA AUCKLAND, This Day. 'An armed hold-up took place in a Chinese fruiterer's shop at Remuera at midnight when two men, one wearing the uniform of a New Zealand soldier, robbed the proprietor after he had engaged in a desperate struggle with his assailants and had£een struck on the head with the butt of a heavy automatic pistol. Altogether four men were involved in the hold-up. Two servicemen waited in a' sedan, car outside the shop, and when the other two men came out of the shop after robbing the Chinese the four drove off at a fast speed and escaped. The victim of the attack was Francis Wong Hop, aged 40. The Chinese opened'the door in response to a knock, which he believed was from a policeman. One of the two men produced a nistol saying, "You know what we 3 Hand ft over." The Chinese broke away, but was finally cornered and given a hard blow on top of the head. Hop was not knocked unconscious, but was dazed. While m this condition his assailants took from his pockets a £5 note and two £1 notes. Investigations by the police are proceeding. Evening Post, Volume CXXXVI, Issue 81, 2 October 1943, Page 6

MANAGER'S THEFTS POTATOES FROM NEXT DOOR (

By Telegraph—Press Association.) AUCKLAND, This Day. Appearing at the Police Court on summons William Maskell, aged 57, manager of a Self-Help store at Karangahape Road, pleaded guilty to the theft of seven bags of potatoes valued at £1 15s, the property of Wong Sic Yue, a greengrocer next door. The police said that for some time the Chinaman had. been missing potatoes and .onions from the back of his shop. A watch was kept and Maskell was caught in the act. Defending counsel said that Maskell had 'been in his present employment for five years and apart. from this lapse" was of exemplary character. He could not account for his lapse. The potatoes went into stock and the proceeds went into the till of his employers, who, however, knew nothing about it., Maskell's wife had been ill and that had affected him greatly. The Magistrate said it seemed an extraordinary case. It was not a sudden impulse as there were a number of thefts. Maskell was fined £1 on one charge and convicted and discharged on another. He was ordered to make restitution. Evening Post, Volume CXXIII, Issue 98, 27 April 1937, Page 11

CHINESE GAMBLER. A SENSATIONAL CAPTURE.

DRAGGED FROM HIDING. AUCKLAND, July 23, In the vicinity of last midnight there was considerable consternation in Grey street, when the police raided a two-storeyed house near the Town Hall, with a view to verifying a suspicion that the place was used as a Chinese gambling-hoiise. Sergeants McCarthy and Fernley headed the raiding party, which included Plain- Clothes Constables Potter, Clifford, and Lambert and three other constables. At 11.30 p.m. the sergeants burst in the front door, which was locked, while the plain-clothes men gained entrance by side windows. A number of Chinamen were surprised, sitting about tabies ill a large downstairs room, but no sooner had the police got into the room when the light, an electric installation, was switched off, and there was a wild rush in the darkness. When the light was re-established there was found to be a considerable decrease in the attendance of the main room, and the police proceeded to search* the upstairs fbSms, with the result that Chinese were discovered Hiding in all sorts of queer places. From under beds, and rolled up in blankets in odd corners, the constables brought bland Celestials to light, while several were found sheltering on the roof, and one was caught crouching inside a barrel. Altogether fifteen Chinese Were collected, while two were seen to escape through side windows. In the room from which the hurry-scurry started was found a collection of cards, dice, and dominoes, and a fan-tan outfit, the latter being set out on a table as if a game had 'been in progress, or about to start. The man who was deemed to be the occupier of the house, Harry Wong (54), was arrested on a charge of keeping a common gaminghouse; and the others were detained on charges Of being found in a gaming-house. The Chinese were taken by motor car to the police station; where a personal search was made, and Wohg wag found to be in possession of £12, while one of the alleged gamesters, Ah Loy (67), had £93 'n his pockets, and the others had only small sums of cash upon them. The search of the house resulted in a considerable sum of money being found in a drawer. The arrested Chinamen came before Mr F. V. Frazer, S.M., this morning, and were remanded till Friday. Bail was fixed at a cash deposit of £100 for Harry Wong, and a cash deposit of £i 3 for each of the other accused. Northern Advocate , 23 July 1917, Page 4

GAMING CHARGE CHINESE HEAVILY FINED.

PRESS ASSOCIATION.) n AUCKLAND, 4th August,Wong Doo, a Chinese, was fined £50 to-day on a charge of permitting his premises to be used as a common gaminghouse. Security for appeal was filed at £ls, plus the fine and costs. £4 12s 6d. The cases against twenty-one others were adjourned pending the appeal. Wong Sun is charged with keeping the house, two others with assisting, and the rest with being found on the premises. The defence in Wong Doo's case was that the games were not games of chance any more than whist, euchre, or any game of cards ;-also that the game described by the police was not played on the date of the police raid, 16th July. The Chinese game of "ma chuck," which figured in the charges, was explained by Mr. L. P. Leary in the Auckland Police Court case on Tuesday. Ma chuck," he said, is a game played by four players. There are 136 pieces, with 34 varieties and four pieces of each kind. There are what might be described as three suits, running from one to nine. The remaining seven are not suits, but four of them represent the four winds of heaven. The other three are honours"—the "white, green, and red. .The object of the game is to fill the hand with either runs of three or sets of three or four of the same kind. The player who by lot is decided to be the player in the East first draws his pieces from a sqtiare of seventeen in the side. The remainder draw, in rotation until they get a hand of 13. Then the 'player on the East draws an odd one, which he either puts into his hand or discards into the centre of the square, which is known as The Sacred Valley." This can be picked up by any' of the other players to make three or four, or by the next player to make a run. If it survives both of these fates it becomes "dead," and lies on the table merely as an index as to what had not been collected. The pieces are picked up by the players in rotation to improve their hands, and whilst the ostensible, object of the game is to make a full hand, the true object is to block the other man from declaring his hand before you have gathered a strong hand yourself. The explanation of a good deal of skill in the game, says'Mr. Leary,'lies in the scoring, because various hands score more than others, and therefore it pays to hold up the other man from scoring by refusing to discard what you have until your hand is a sufficiently strong one to disclose it and rake in a substantial stake. An expert player can, after two or three discards, tell to a nicety what the other three players are collecting, and sometimes hold back his discards to prevent any other player getting in a position to declare his hand. This leads to a deadlock, and the game must be played again. The full game consists of each player getting his tally for one hand, and this means-.-skilled players sometimes take as long as nine hours to work out. Evening Post, Volume CIV, Issue 31, 5 August 1922, Page 4

DECREE NISI CHINAMAN'S SUIT CO-RESPONDENT NOT NAMED

(By Telegraph—Press Association.) AUCKLAND, This Day An unsuccessful marital venture of a Chinese with a European woman was outlined to Mr. Justice Fair in the Supreme Court this morning when George Wong Yew sought a divorce from Edith Helen Yew on the ground of misconduct. The petitioner, who described himself as a merchant, said he was married at Palmerston North in 1929. Later he moved to Auckland and had a trip to China, returning to Auckland, and remained there till 1933, when the respondent left for Hong Kong, it being arranged that he should join her there the following year. The petitioner gave her £140 when she was about to leave for Hong Kong. He received a letter from his wife stating that she did not wish to live with him again, and a subsequent letter stated that she had been having a hectic life and had decided long ago that it was not possible for them to live together again. She also admitted misconduct. Mr. Schramm, for the petitioner, said that the respondent had refused to give the name of the co-respondent. Leave having been granted to dispense with naming the co-respondent, counsel asked for a decree nisi. His Honour agreed to accept certain affidavits and granted the decree. Evening Post , Issue 67, 19 March 1936, Page 4

An audience which packed the Chineso Mission Hall assembled on Wednesday evening to farewell a popular missioner, the Bey. E. Y. P. Lee, who leaves on Friday for Sydney, en route to Hong Kong! The Yen. Archdeacon Johnson presided. Valedictory speeches were made by the Beys. Canons Watson, Bice, F. B. Bedgrave, and H. K. Fry, the Chinese Consul (Mr. K. H. Li), Messrs. Jackson, Webber, Wong Tong, Sue, Low See, D. J. Kwoin, and Wong Poy, Master Stanley Wong, and Mesdames Li and Sue. The speakers referred to Mr. Lee's many good qualities, and.stated how.he had carried out his duties with ability and tact, and had been an inspiration for good to his fellow-men. Handsome presentations were made by the congregation, pupils, English teachers, and Sunday school children. Mr. Lee suitably expressed his thanks. Supper was served by the teachers. Evening Post, Volume CXII, Issue 79, 30 September 1926, Page 11

LOCAL CHINESE MISSION

Last Sunday Mr. Y. F. Leung, who has come from China to take the place of the Rev. E. Y P. Lee, began his ministry in the Chinese Mission Church in Frederick street in the presence of a very large congregation of his countrymen, many having to stand throughput the service. The Rev F, B. Redgrave, the general secretary of the Board of Missions, on behalf of the Bishop of Wellington, instituted Mr. Leung. Mr. Sue Shen Hing and Hessrs. J. D. Kwong andN. Y. Sui spoke, assuring their new missioner of the Jiearty support of the' Chinese community. Mr. Leung is a graduate of-St. Paul's College in Canton, who received his theological training in the Union Theological Seminary in that city. He worked for some years in Japan among Chinese university students, and was about to'be ordained when the great earthquake put an end to hia work there. Last evening there was a social gathering to welcome the new miarioner. The Bishop of Wellington presided, and addresses were also given by the Consul (Mr. Li), Mr. H. Jackson (secretary to the Consulate), Archdeacon Johnson (the first superintendent of the mission), Canon Watson (the present superintendent), the Rev. P. B. Redgrave (secretary and treasurer), the Rev. W. Mawson (in charge of the Auckland mission, Mr. Sue (Baptist missioner), Mr. S. Webber (on behalf, of the teachers),, Mr, Nelson Gee (for the elder scholars), Mr. Wong Poy (on behalf of the business community), and by Mrs. Li for the Chinese women in Wellington. Several speakers eulogised the great work done amongst the women and children, by Mrs. Wong, the widow of a former missioner, Mr. Leung, first in English and then in Cantonese, spoke eloquently of the great work done by his predecessor (Mr, Lee), and earnestly asked for the prayers of all friends and attendants of the mission. Evening Post, Volume CXII, Issue 121, 18 November 1926, Page 19

PREMISES RAIDED OPIUM SEIZED

SIX CHINESE CHARGED (By Telegraph—Press Association.) AUCKLAND, September 0, Chopping their way through a heavily barricaded window on the second storey of a building in Grey's Avenue on Wednesday night, detectives entered premises and seized a quantity of prepared opium, opium seconds, and pipes. The detectives, who climbed a ladder placed on the verandah in front of the building, had considerable difficulty in entering. The window was barred inside with inch planking, backed with three uprights and four cross pieces of three-inch by two-inch timber, reinforced with wire. A hole was cut and one detective went in and opened the door for the others. The doors were all reinforced on the inside. As a result of the raid six Chinese appeared in the Magistrate's Court before Mr. Wyvern Wilson, S.M. Five of them, Gin On, laundryman; Wong Mow, aged 38; Ah Lee, gardener, aged 25; Ah Sai, gardener, aged 45; and Shim Lind, pleaded guilty to charges of being found on premises for the purpose of smoking opium. "The premises are well known and have figured in court before," said the- Magistrate. "The place was barricaded, and they knew the risk they were running." Gin On and Wong Mow, who had been before the Court previously, were each fined £20 and costs. Ah Lee, Ah Sai, and Shim Lind were each fined £12 10s and costs. Stanley Chin Home, laundryman, aged 47, was charged witrr permitting premises _to be used for smoking opium and with being found in possession of prepared opium. He was remanded, bail being fixed at £100. Evening Post, Volume CXXIV, Issue 62, 10 September 1937, Page 5

AUCKLAND OPIUM DENS.

CHINESE FINED FOR POSSESSION. Three Chinese were charged at today's Police Court, before Mr If. W. Brabant, HM-, with being in possession of opium. Wong Gong was charged with having three tins and a pot, Ah Pang seven" tins, and Way Royal, alias Ah Louie, seven tins of the drug. Mr Cotter, on behalf of the accused, pleaded guilty, and asked His Worship to impose a light penalty, as it was the first prosecution which had taken place in Auckland. The Act making it illegal to possess opium only came into force on December iUst, and when the Chinese came to know that their beloved drug was absolutely prohibited they would cease to offend. The accused all bore excellent characters. Chief Detective Grace, who prosecuted on behalf of the police, said that Wong Gong was a merchant, and the others kept a gambling den and smoking-room. The police had seized several opium pipes, and a fairly large quantity of opium. Mr Cotter suggested that the premises of Pang and Royal was a lodging house, but Mr Grace said the place was fitted up as an opium den. At Gono'.s house they seized pipes and found a room arranged for smoking. His Worship remarked that the fine should be more than nominal taking into consideration the fact that the places seemed to have been used as opium smoking dens. He imposed a penalty of £5 each and costs, and pointed out that the maximum penalty was £50. Several opium pipes and a quantity of the drug were produced in the Court by the police, and have been confiscated. Auckland Star, Volume XXXIV, Issue 69, 21 March 1903, Page 5


SKULL FRACTURED WOMAN KILLED BY VAN

(By Telegraph—Press Association.) AUCKLAND, April G. While crossing Remuera Road to use a telephone at the Remuera Post Office Mrs. Gertrude Atkinson, aged 46, was knocked down by a light delivery van tonight and killed. The van, driven by Willie Wong, a Chinese butcher, of Manukau Road, Epsom, was travelling towards Newmarket. Mrs. Atkinson had left her cake and confectionery business which is on the southern side and had almost reached the inward tram lines when she was struck and thrown heavily, the vehicle passing over her. The impact severely damaged the van's radiator grid. Mrs. Atkinson received a fracture of the skull and death occurred almost immediately. Evening Post, Volume CXXI, Issue 83, 7 April 1936, Page 6

LORRY RUNS AWAY SMASHES INTO HOUSE

(By Telegraph.) (Special to "The Evening Post.") AUCKLAND, This Day. When Wong Kee yesterday left his motor-lorry in a street with tho engine running and tho 'u-akes applied it moved forward and ran down tho steep gradient of Lichfield road, Parnell. It crashed through a fence and struck the sido of Mr. D. A. Chinnery-Brown'a house at the corner of Glanvillo terrace. Tho fenco was smashed into splinters, and some of the weatherboards had to be removed before the vehicle could be oxtricated. The family was at home, and Mr. Chinnery-Brown was talking with his daughter in the room behind the damaged wall. No one was injured. When removed from the wreckage the lorry was driven away. Evening Post, Volume CXIII, Issue 75, 30 March 1927, Page 10

CHINESE MARKET

CHINESE MARKET THE AUCKLAND PROJECT COMPANY REGISTERED (Special to "The Evening Post.") AUCKLAND, 16th October. The proposal for the formation of a Chinese market in Auckland was advanced a further stage yesterday, when a private company, known as Produce Markets, Ltd., was registered. The capital of the company is composed 10,000 £1 shares, which are divided into two groups, one of 5100 shares, and the other of 4900 shares. The company may at any time, subject to the provisions of the articles of association, increase or reduce the capital. The subscribers are Walter Alan Donald, merchant, 5100 shares, the whole of the first group; Thomas Wong Doo, merchant, 4450 shares; Fong Foo Soy, market gardener, 350 shares; and Thomas Wong Doo, jun., clerk, 100 shares. All reside in Auckland. The new organisation has already selected a site for its headquarters, having acquired by tender from the Auckland Harbour Board for a lease of 50 years two sections in Customs Street West, opposite the Auckland City Markets. Evening Post, Volume CX, Issue 93, 17 October 1930, Page 7

Friday, October 28, 2011

Harry Wong

The Auckland police at midnight raided a Chinese house occupied by Harry Wong and arrested Wong and fourteen other Chinese found there, the former on a charge of being the occupant of and the latter with being found in a common gaming-house. The police effected an entrance by a side window, and by forcing a door which was barricaded. Some of the Chinese were caught on the roof and others in the coal cellar. Marlborough Express, Volume LI, Issue 171, 21 July 1917, Page 4

Working Sundays

Eleven Chinese appeared before the justices at the Auckland Police Court charged with working in their various gardens on a Sunday. One of the bunch pleaded not guilty to a charge of working on Sunday, saying that it was a cold, frosty morning, and he only went out to pull up a few weeds, as they were harmful to the young plants. The Bench, however, showed no sympathy, and the whole lot were convicted and fined 20s each, with 10s costs.

Wanganui Herald, Volume XXXXIV, Issue 12797, 16 June 1909, Page 4